From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:44:56 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <301120172144567865%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <291120171552201340%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <291120172155172901%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <291120172209102843%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <> <301120171254418909%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <301120171946271329%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="45cb7d992eea03c8b6a6899a8b6e0b03";
logging-data="15319"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18s5wF7BD3fCRXOp3ePuMN7"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AwUMNapX+NoAFJe9CgHvTAN43Xk=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, Eric Stevens<> wrote:

> >the reality is that most people aren't interested in waiting a half
> >hour for their photos and videos to copy.
> Most people don't have half an hour's worth of photos or videos to
> copy.

they do if they bought slow cards, possibly much longer than that.