From: PeterN <peter.new@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6
From: PeterN <peter.new@verizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:56:20 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <ovrr2a03n3@news6.newsguy.com>
References: <f89k8uF1q43U2@mid.individual.net>
<0001HW.1FCFE732003AB5A470000085F2CF@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: peter.new.nospam@verizon.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: pef2f58847507dd52f93f049d0786689c2ce1652db7a35b16.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.1FCFE732003AB5A470000085F2CF@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 1367
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3495244452
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/30/2017 2:13 AM, Savageduck wrote:

<snip>


> 
> For now I will live with my X-T2, and consider an X-E3 to replace my X-E2 as
> a second body. As for the X-E2 I am considering making that a dedicated B&W
> shooter.
> 

Do you mean a conversion, or that you would only use it for B&W. Maybe 
my mind is channeled, because I am going to have my D300 converted to 
infrared, and am thinking of a UV conversion.














-- 
PeterN