From: PeterN <peter.new@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news4
From: PeterN <peter.new@verizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:13:23 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <ovrv2p0104v@news4.newsguy.com>
References: <f89k8uF1q43U2@mid.individual.net>
<0001HW.1FCFE732003AB5A470000085F2CF@news.giganews.com>
<ovrr2a03n3@news6.newsguy.com> <011220171005299178%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Reply-To: peter.new.nospam@verizon.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: p8959b441b0f1491abb5ea94f76c6ac9652b263f868307d6d.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <011220171005299178%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 1629
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2268792440
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/1/2017 10:05 AM, nospam wrote:
> In article<ovrr2a03n3@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN
><peter.new@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
>> and am thinking of a UV conversion.
> 
> you'll need special lenses.
> 

I know. I also have some old  Nikkor E lenses, that will transmit in the 
350 -400 range if I remove the coating, because they have very few 
elements. Old lenses and old digital cameras did not have all that much 
UV blocking. While it will not be perfect, and I expect a lot of 
distortion, The combo should be fine for photographic purposes. It is 
definitely not perfect. If I want more, I can always get quartz/fluoride 
lenses.


-- 
PeterN