From: PeterN <>
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Full headers:
From: PeterN <>
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:13:23 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<> <011220171005299178%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <011220171005299178%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 1629
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2268792440
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/1/2017 10:05 AM, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN
><> wrote:
>> and am thinking of a UV conversion.
> you'll need special lenses.

I know. I also have some old  Nikkor E lenses, that will transmit in the 
350 -400 range if I remove the coating, because they have very few 
elements. Old lenses and old digital cameras did not have all that much 
UV blocking. While it will not be perfect, and I expect a lot of 
distortion, The combo should be fine for photographic purposes. It is 
definitely not perfect. If I want more, I can always get quartz/fluoride