From: PeterN <peter.new@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news4
From: PeterN <peter.new@verizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:20:35 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <ovrvga010gb@news4.newsguy.com>
References: <f89k8uF1q43U2@mid.individual.net>
<0001HW.1FCFE732003AB5A470000085F2CF@news.giganews.com>
<ovrr2a03n3@news6.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FD1AEE600A5832D70000CDF72CF@news.giganews.com>
<0001HW.1FD1B19200A6236970000CDF72CF@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: peter.new.nospam@verizon.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: pe756eac240a222b19ffc4d0826e4d58bd28411868df80180.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.1FD1B19200A6236970000CDF72CF@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4150246404
X-Received-Bytes: 2730
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/1/2017 10:49 AM, Savageduck wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2017, Savageduck wrote
> (in article<0001HW.1FD1AEE600A5832D70000CDF72CF@news.giganews.com>):
> 
>> On Dec 1, 2017, PeterN wrote
>> (in article<ovrr2a03n3@news6.newsguy.com>):
>>
>>> On 11/30/2017 2:13 AM, Savageduck wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> For now I will live with my X-T2, and consider an X-E3 to replace my X-E2
>>>> as
>>>> a second body. As for the X-E2 I am considering making that a dedicated B&W
>>>> shooter.
>>>
>>> Do you mean a conversion, or that you would only use it for B&W. Maybe
>>> my mind is channeled, because I am going to have my D300 converted to
>>> infrared, and am thinking of a UV conversion.
>>
>> A conversion has been a consideration. However, the only company currently
>> doing B&W conversions is only doing them to Fujifilm X-Pro1 bodies (that is
>> among the Fujifilm bodies). So for now I will just be using it for in-camera
>> B&W.
>>
>> These guys also do IR conversions along with their monochrome conversions,
>> but the Fujifilm in-camera B&W is pretty good.
>>
>> <https://www.maxmax.com>
>>
>> <https://petapixel.com/2017/02/17/fujifilm-monochrome-cameras-4800-ch...
> 
> ....and:
> 
> <https://fstoppers.com/gear/maxmax-launches-monochrome-fujifilm-x-pro...
> x100s-166132>
> 

Life Pixel has a good reputation. For my last conversion, I simply 
pulled out the IR filter. But, that was on a P&S, that I otherwise would 
just sit in a box. This time around, I am looking for faux color IR.

But why are you converting for BW only?

-- 
PeterN