From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 14:57:58 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <011220171457582172%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <301120171254418909%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <301120171946271329%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <301120172122538513%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <011220170123311498%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <011220171348010348%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="45cb7d992eea03c8b6a6899a8b6e0b03";
logging-data="3450"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19a4tY7Y7ERCNThQtDgH1xu"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qmbJ4opuge9gkliMIKh8hthZwcI=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, Tony Cooper<> wrote:

> >> nospam is now floundering around trying to defend his mistakes by
> >> using "you haven't a clue" defense instead of facts. You can always
> >> tell when nospam has realized he's lost the argument when he starts
> >> peppering his replies with that and other insinuations that the other
> >> person doesn't know what he's talking about.
> >
> >i'm not floundering *at* *all*. you are well over your head, you made
> >*numerous* fundamental errors, just like you did in the dcc thread, and
> >worse, you flat out refuse to admit or even discuss it.
> >
> >tl;dr you do *not* know what you're talking about, which is why you
> >snipped everything.
> More floundering.


> Anyone who writes, as you did,  "move is another, although move means
> deleting the originals" should never accuse anyone else of being over
> their head in a topic.

that's *exactly* what move means. 

you're *well* over your head and sinking *fast*.

as with the dcc thread, you refuse to admit you haven't a clue or show
any interest in learning something.