From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 14:57:58 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <011220171457582172%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <ovnt8j0glb@news3.newsguy.com> <fp6v1d5cdqqtjp87njgo0gbkddantkdplm@4ax.com> <301120171254418909%nospam@nospam.invalid> <tu712d9i2a7ss45k5c7a5gfhe7dr2l1j56@4ax.com> <301120171946271329%nospam@nospam.invalid> <q1a12d9msklql1uenqv73qfdg3l647mbbs@4ax.com> <301120172122538513%nospam@nospam.invalid> <25i12d9kmctuhca9v12h2sdjiii8bsovi9@4ax.com> <011220170123311498%nospam@nospam.invalid> <nbo22dhh9pgutmiqoohij7utb3ouvil9e7@4ax.com> <011220171348010348%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1bc32dp8bgdd22b02f6urm783aosmppdfa@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="45cb7d992eea03c8b6a6899a8b6e0b03";
logging-data="3450"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19a4tY7Y7ERCNThQtDgH1xu"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qmbJ4opuge9gkliMIKh8hthZwcI=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<1bc32dp8bgdd22b02f6urm783aosmppdfa@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper<tonycooper214@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> nospam is now floundering around trying to defend his mistakes by
> >> using "you haven't a clue" defense instead of facts. You can always
> >> tell when nospam has realized he's lost the argument when he starts
> >> peppering his replies with that and other insinuations that the other
> >> person doesn't know what he's talking about.
> >
> >i'm not floundering *at* *all*. you are well over your head, you made
> >*numerous* fundamental errors, just like you did in the dcc thread, and
> >worse, you flat out refuse to admit or even discuss it.
> >
> >tl;dr you do *not* know what you're talking about, which is why you
> >snipped everything.
> 
> More floundering.

nope. 

> Anyone who writes, as you did,  "move is another, although move means
> deleting the originals" should never accuse anyone else of being over
> their head in a topic.

that's *exactly* what move means. 

you're *well* over your head and sinking *fast*.

as with the dcc thread, you refuse to admit you haven't a clue or show
any interest in learning something.