From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:51:29 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <011220171751296862%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <291120172155172901%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <291120172209102843%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <> <301120171254418909%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <301120171946271329%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <301120172144567865%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="45cb7d992eea03c8b6a6899a8b6e0b03";
logging-data="4173"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TKaLQBO7mRZaArLJbP8wV"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0GL17M7dQtplWKI8GwWP+SXZKx4=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, Eric Stevens<> wrote:

> >> >the reality is that most people aren't interested in waiting a half
> >> >hour for their photos and videos to copy.
> >> 
> >> Most people don't have half an hour's worth of photos or videos to
> >> copy.
> >
> >they do if they bought slow cards, possibly much longer than that.
> The source of your data is ... ?