From: Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom,on ban at a time
Full headers:
From: Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk>
References: <c8bdd3a6-f005-4a9b-afe1-af5cda451693@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom,
on ban at a time
Message-ID: <57cae9f1d88d084cc1c28c014e1866db@remailer.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:26:36 +0000 (GMT)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<c8bdd3a6-f005-4a9b-afe1-af5cda451693@googlegroups.com>
RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sure, it's ok to blanket a country with 500,000 CCTV cameras, ensuring no one will ever have any
kind of privacy again except locked in their bedrooms with no windows, but fly a drone above 400ft? 
BAN IT!!
>
> http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42126150

My understanding is that the 400 foot limit is to make the drones 
not interfere with actual aircraft that have people in them. There 
have been instances of drones bouncing off aircraft, and in one 
case colliding with the rotor of a helicopter, which could have 
brought the helicopter down.