From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Subject: Re: Why Fuji Don't Do FF!
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 03:02:59 -0600
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 01:03:00 -0800
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.1FD6984401CC333C70000881E2CF@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Why Fuji Dont Do FF!
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <f8l2suFlpd4U1@mid.individual.net> <f8l3c7Flt1pU1@mid.individual.net> <0857ed41-fc60-447c-bf15-5958a72de01c@googlegroups.com> <3omc2d5h2kc5eupngh66rpcnj40c109rpb@4ax.com>
Lines: 28
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Exa9ZB5kArr++lPfT+ZfDoVUIXqptvFBAoY54UCtDDOs4KJnN9nm7o5waKDWzTq4rsymOnkdfT+tMMl!0uJ5bJFvVxMtV9hROnboiEeTHvTvfZCccIeHaa4IqLv+ezNLgD+cZA7J4oGJwQSJzYM2ixPdaLw6!9qoMgrcumgM=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1886
Print Article
Forward Article
On Dec 5, 2017, Eric Stevens wrote
(in article<3omc2d5h2kc5eupngh66rpcnj40c109rpb@4ax.com>):

> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:44:22 -0800 (PST), RichA<rander3128@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 4 December 2017 09:11:26 UTC-5, android wrote:
> > > They take the FF and one half instead... 100MP?
> > >
> > > <https://fujiaddict.com/2017/12/01/one-more-thing-additional-fujifilm...
> > > 0r-and-fujifilm-gfx-100s-information-plus-roadmap-update/>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > teleportation kills
> >
> > 100mp medium format is where they leave any pretense about "parity" with
> > Sony 45mp FF sensors way behind.
>
> Just think of the raw file size!

Fat!

-- 

Regards,
Savageduck