From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Why Fuji Don't Do FF!
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Why Fuji Dont Do FF!
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:09:33 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Organization: news.individual.net
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <f8n62bF66ekU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <f8l2suFlpd4U1@mid.individual.net> <f8l3c7Flt1pU1@mid.individual.net> <0857ed41-fc60-447c-bf15-5958a72de01c@googlegroups.com> <3omc2d5h2kc5eupngh66rpcnj40c109rpb@4ax.com> <0001HW.1FD6984401CC333C70000881E2CF@news.giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net esssa8RxC17P42N4OMwPJgZnpKkVcGEdHK60MAJLQFoiGLxOY5
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ne/oyQzf1Y+qPyo2QCp9DRjJO1w=
X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.Free:1.65
Print Article
Forward Article
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> Wrote in message:
> On Dec 5, 2017, Eric Stevens wrote
> (in article<3omc2d5h2kc5eupngh66rpcnj40c109rpb@4ax.com>):
> 
>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:44:22 -0800 (PST), RichA<rander3128@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday, 4 December 2017 09:11:26 UTC-5, android wrote:
>> > > They take the FF and one half instead... 100MP?
>> > >
>> > > <https://fujiaddict.com/2017/12/01/one-more-thing-additional-fujifilm...
>> > > 0r-and-fujifilm-gfx-100s-information-plus-roadmap-update/>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > teleportation kills
>> >
>> > 100mp medium format is where they leave any pretense about "parity" with
>> > Sony 45mp FF sensors way behind.
>>
>> Just think of the raw file size!
> 
> Fat!
> 
You feel the want! Right? 
-- 
360 ain't enough


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/