From: Whisky-dave <>
Subject: Re: OT A New Optical Illusion Was Just Discovered, And It's BreakingOur Brains
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id f10mr3086002qtj.11.1513094879299;
Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id x191mr438017vkx.2.1513094879010; Tue,
12 Dec 2017 08:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:07:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p0omp1$1bn1$>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
References: <> <p0omp1$1bn1$>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: OT A New Optical Illusion Was Just Discovered, And Its Breaking
Our Brains
From: Whisky-dave <>
Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:07:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3198165717
X-Received-Bytes: 2744
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 13:49:32 UTC, Mayayana  wrote:
> "Whisky-dave"<> wrote
> |
> | Not sure about these sort of things does this also mean that if looking at 
> a photograph, we'll see distorted lines when they aren't distorted ?
> |
> |
> |
>   It doesn't sound very scientific to me.

What do you mean by that ?

> Since when
> are there "underlying mechanisms" for curve and
> corner perception? 

Well there must be a reason why we see a corner or a curve otherwise this wouldnlt work on anyone.

>Depth perception, to render 3-D
> vision, depends on the play of light. I don't see any
> need to make up new mechanisms to explain that
> phenomenon.

Where is the 3D in this ?

>   The links are broken on that page. The scientist
> seems to be legitimate, but seems to specialize
> in "is-it-a-vase-or-is-it-a-face" research. At least
> my taxes are not funding this one. :)  

Most likely digg site playing up, maybe th4e link is just too long.