From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: iMac Pro - available to order very soon!
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.3.79 with SMTP id w15mr17248750qtg.10.1513593673318;
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 02:41:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.61.149 with SMTP id k143mr378175vka.7.1513593673176; Mon,
18 Dec 2017 02:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g35no3183144qtk.1!news-out.google.com!v55ni1173qtc.0!nntp.google.com!g35no3183142qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 02:41:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <151220171432311415%star@sky.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <iJTXB.418520$Cq7.15629@fx01.fr7> <r4e5ge-mp5.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net>
<3e3ef41b-a8e3-45f1-836d-02cb47d9a61d@googlegroups.com> <v0h7ge-c1t.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net>
<141220170836130530%not@aol.com> <cc7f121f-827f-4c33-a4fe-88ffde1858b0@googlegroups.com>
<141220171508003846%star@sky.net> <caae453d-2749-46b4-b4d0-3aa19ef5c04e@googlegroups.com>
<151220171432311415%star@sky.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bb8b1169-3baf-4572-bd5a-c662c01631ce@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: iMac Pro - available to order very soon!
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:41:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3742180752
X-Received-Bytes: 2359
Print Article
Forward Article
On Friday, 15 December 2017 19:32:37 UTC, Davoud  wrote:
> Davoud: 
> > > Thus a machine so powerful that its specs can't be compared to the
> > > older machine costs only 70% of what the older machine cost.
> 
> Whisky-dave:
> > Doesn't matter to me.
> 
> So you're posting on something that doesn't matter to you. Run out of
> books?


 You're claiming that the specs can't be compared to older machines well they can, and I can even,
if you can't.
And it certainmly isn't 70% of what the older machines cost either, unless you can explain how you
work it out.



Books, what are you talking about.




> 
> -- 
> I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
> you will say in your entire life.
> 
> usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm