From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx02.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Message-ID: <4i1h3dt7mmqip10247v98c9u35ceg8pafv@4ax.com>
References: <00942a15-c476-4273-9671-c1ef61328784@googlegroups.com> <p0rg46$1tqe$1@gioia.aioe.org> <131220171132354803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <d8ec4ebe-4153-448c-a71b-43f86105871c@googlegroups.com> <181220171608156123%nospam@nospam.invalid> <e2bafadf-81f6-45a2-bd23-34a8dc0ed858@googlegroups.com> <p19er6$101g$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f6jg3d1m0i3rtes3tmhtvgs68ul7a6jp12@4ax.com> <p19rj5$1fqt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:27:45 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 2786
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2109170945
Print Article
Forward Article
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 20:54:34 -0500, "Mayayana"<mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

>"Eric Stevens"<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote
>|
>| I don't make money out of Photoshop and for what it costs to rent CC I
>| find I save money.
>
>   I'm curious. Presumably you had the last version
>of CS before it went online. And now you pay.....
>$12/month or something like that? $120-$150/year?

I never had CS. Over the years I variously had Gimp, ... PhotoPaint,
Paintshop Pro, NIK, DxO and various plug ins to extend them. Updates
kept arriving and no matter what I had at the time it still cost me
money to keep them up todate. The costs were accumulating and when CC
arrived I leapt at it.

>What do you find added to the online version that's
>worth so much? Why is it worthwhile to always
>update to new versions? Are the handful of new features
>really so critical in what you do? Even people using
>it fulltime for work typically skip a version. That's a
>big part of why Adobe went to the rental model.
>They make a bit less than if they sold each version,
>but they weren't selling each version to most people.
>Rental makes more money than selling only every other
>version. And they're not under pressure to cook up
>a snazzy update every year.
>
>    I repeatedly see
>conversations here where it's clear that people are
>spending a small fortune to rent CS as well as buying
>all sorts of expensive, adjunct tools. I don't get it.
>Unless the main thing you like to do is cutting edge
>special effects, like airbrushing skin or stitching scenes
>together seamlessly. Most of the basic editing functionality
>has been around for 20 years.
> 
>
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens