From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:45:04 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <181220172245044706%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <p0rg46$1tqe$> <131220171132354803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <181220171608156123%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <p19er6$101g$> <> <p19rj5$1fqt$> <> <p1a1a9$1m3j$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="4bb30daa75e7ebefbd763552a97210ff";
logging-data="7002"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+bzEE8KLaVZxJbAobYd0zS"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q3D35fAUlpk+iIdU7eddhk2VCMc=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <p1a1a9$1m3j$>, Mayayana<mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

> | I never had CS. Over the years I variously had Gimp, ... PhotoPaint,
> | Paintshop Pro, NIK, DxO and various plug ins to extend them. Updates
> | kept arriving and no matter what I had at the time it still cost me
> | money to keep them up todate. The costs were accumulating and when CC
> | arrived I leapt at it.
>    That's what I don't get. Why did you need to keep
> buying updates? I don't find that I'm missing functionality.

you don't do anything beyond the basics, so for you, the free stuff is

other people have more sophisticated needs and therefore can justify
more advanced apps.