From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:16:06 -0600
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:16:06 -0800
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.1FEA299601123D5970000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <00942a15-c476-4273-9671-c1ef61328784@googlegroups.com> <p0rg46$1tqe$1@gioia.aioe.org> <131220171132354803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <d8ec4ebe-4153-448c-a71b-43f86105871c@googlegroups.com> <181220171608156123%nospam@nospam.invalid> <e2bafadf-81f6-45a2-bd23-34a8dc0ed858@googlegroups.com> <p19er6$101g$1@gioia.aioe.org> <33e7625e-8c31-47f9-9523-6c65af05aa7c@googlegroups.com> <6rkg3ddh49uj96ual0l6ee4vddb3vnnr3u@4ax.com> <p19qv4$1f8c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172047100279%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p19rs6$1gce$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172123331269%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1b4qj$17kh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <191220171145292036%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1cq8k013i9@news3.newsguy.com>
Lines: 42
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-fAoKnKWc0XCFc7nVIN1zFQBGyr4ddh+99jNrM1Zl7nv58FchXL1AtyECMSVFoLm70sm51D7mUEQaoWJ!S7ZJ9vhQZuIMG8+BvuYsEknhRZuXeDSC5IYbiCEBwq6qkiHGx4hJahHhtFEwcMK+xJkFaTvH7ZsB!rOISbUUU9tg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3546
Print Article
Forward Article
On Dec 19, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article<p1cq8k013i9@news3.newsguy.com>):

> On 12/19/2017 11:45 AM, nospam wrote:
> > In article<p1b4qj$17kh$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Mayayana
> ><mayayana@invalid.nospam>  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Being mean to people is not a game. It's just being
> > > mean. You demean yourself and coarsen your own
> > > sensibility, regardless of whether it bothers the target.
> >
> > think about that next time you call people 'apple seeds' and other
> > derogatory terms.
>
> I don't consider calling someone an Appleseed if a derogatory term. I
> have some personal friends who I call Appleseeds, regularly. Yet some
> got very insulted when I mentioned I called Apple Support, instead of
> them. Also in my capacity as a stockholder, I love Appleseeds. They have
> made me and my daughters, a lot of money.

Intent on the part of the user of the term, and how it is received by the 
individual addressed are going to be the determining factors as to whether, 
or not the usage is derogatory.When I see Appleseed used, my first thought is 
that it is intended to be derogatory, and provocative.

Appleseed is not a term used by users of Apple products to describe 
themselves. It is a term used by non-Apple users to label Apple users. While 
you might not have intended your usage to be derogatory, you have used it to 
segregate/differentiate yourself from Apple users, and to establish your 
standing as somebody who uses a different OS (...and I know you own and use 
an iphone).If I were you I would stop calling your friends Appleseeds 
regardless of how good APPL has been for you.

In the case of Mayayana, and his anti-Apple bias, his usage of Appleseed is 
undoubtably, and intentionally derogatory. He has a similar anti-Adobe bias.

-- 

Regards,
Savageduck