From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:39:22 -0600
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:39:23 -0800
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.1FEA2F0B011384C570000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <00942a15-c476-4273-9671-c1ef61328784@googlegroups.com> <p0rg46$1tqe$1@gioia.aioe.org> <131220171132354803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <d8ec4ebe-4153-448c-a71b-43f86105871c@googlegroups.com> <181220171608156123%nospam@nospam.invalid> <e2bafadf-81f6-45a2-bd23-34a8dc0ed858@googlegroups.com> <p19er6$101g$1@gioia.aioe.org> <33e7625e-8c31-47f9-9523-6c65af05aa7c@googlegroups.com> <6rkg3ddh49uj96ual0l6ee4vddb3vnnr3u@4ax.com> <p19qv4$1f8c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172047100279%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p19rs6$1gce$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172123331269%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1b4qj$17kh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <191220171145292036%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1cq8k013i9@news3.newsguy.com> <0001HW.1FEA299601123D5970000EED02CF@news.giganews.com> <201220170029101376%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Lines: 49
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-T96IxFGx7Crv0Q/p+VoSoQ483aVbVrKg9VNKspkhnldGaEq78IiJLON2sFPqtmIiUuJ97ALd5D8cJ5j!Vlv3Ct8T4Y9rdOrmXGENlK5QevmaPlIuiO+KElb6//so1wdj2R7qKzg7BjAIBffJYakqfLFJ0187!uxusIP6uHMg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3941
Print Article
Forward Article
On Dec 19, 2017, nospam wrote
(in article<201220170029101376%nospam@nospam.invalid>):

> In article<0001HW.1FEA299601123D5970000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>,
> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>  wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > > > Being mean to people is not a game. It's just being
> > > > > mean. You demean yourself and coarsen your own
> > > > > sensibility, regardless of whether it bothers the target.
> > > >
> > > > think about that next time you call people 'apple seeds' and other
> > > > derogatory terms.
> > >
> > > I don't consider calling someone an Appleseed if a derogatory term. I
> > > have some personal friends who I call Appleseeds, regularly. Yet some
> > > got very insulted when I mentioned I called Apple Support, instead of
> > > them. Also in my capacity as a stockholder, I love Appleseeds. They have
> > > made me and my daughters, a lot of money.
> >
> > Intent on the part of the user of the term, and how it is received by the
> > individual addressed are going to be the determining factors as to whether,
> > or not the usage is derogatory.When I see Appleseed used, my first thought
> > is
> > that it is intended to be derogatory, and provocative.
> >
> > Appleseed is not a term used by users of Apple products to describe
> > themselves. It is a term used by non-Apple users to label Apple users. While
> > you might not have intended your usage to be derogatory, you have used it to
> > segregate/differentiate yourself from Apple users, and to establish your
> > standing as somebody who uses a different OS (...and I know you own and use
> > an iphone).If I were you I would stop calling your friends Appleseeds
> > regardless of how good APPL has been for you.
> >
> > In the case of Mayayana, and his anti-Apple bias, his usage of Appleseed is
> > undoubtably, and intentionally derogatory. He has a similar anti-Adobe bias.
>
> along with anti-microsoft, anti-google, anti-yahoo, anti-facebook,
> anti-aol and many more.
>
> sum it up as anti-everything.

Does that include anti-Twitter, and anti-Hupmobile?

-- 

Regards,
Savageduck