From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.233.232.215 with SMTP id a206mr260497qkg.4.1513767673000;
Wed, 20 Dec 2017 03:01:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.94.215 with SMTP id s206mr625018vkb.1.1513767672895; Wed,
20 Dec 2017 03:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!m31no4438107qtf.0!news-out.google.com!v55ni1648qtc.0!nntp.google.com!g35no4419398qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 03:01:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.1FEA2F0B011384C570000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <00942a15-c476-4273-9671-c1ef61328784@googlegroups.com>
<p0rg46$1tqe$1@gioia.aioe.org> <131220171132354803%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<d8ec4ebe-4153-448c-a71b-43f86105871c@googlegroups.com> <181220171608156123%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<e2bafadf-81f6-45a2-bd23-34a8dc0ed858@googlegroups.com> <p19er6$101g$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<33e7625e-8c31-47f9-9523-6c65af05aa7c@googlegroups.com> <6rkg3ddh49uj96ual0l6ee4vddb3vnnr3u@4ax.com>
<p19qv4$1f8c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172047100279%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p19rs6$1gce$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172123331269%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p1b4qj$17kh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <191220171145292036%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p1cq8k013i9@news3.newsguy.com> <0001HW.1FEA299601123D5970000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>
<201220170029101376%nospam@nospam.invalid> <0001HW.1FEA2F0B011384C570000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2bfc4eb2-5954-4381-9fb4-3c53ee2927b6@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:01:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3384731999
X-Received-Bytes: 4327
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 05:39:30 UTC, Savageduck  wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2017, nospam wrote
> (in article<201220170029101376%nospam@nospam.invalid>):
> 
> > In article<0001HW.1FEA299601123D5970000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>,
> > Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>  wrote:
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Being mean to people is not a game. It's just being
> > > > > > mean. You demean yourself and coarsen your own
> > > > > > sensibility, regardless of whether it bothers the target.
> > > > >
> > > > > think about that next time you call people 'apple seeds' and other
> > > > > derogatory terms.
> > > >
> > > > I don't consider calling someone an Appleseed if a derogatory term. I
> > > > have some personal friends who I call Appleseeds, regularly. Yet some
> > > > got very insulted when I mentioned I called Apple Support, instead of
> > > > them. Also in my capacity as a stockholder, I love Appleseeds. They have
> > > > made me and my daughters, a lot of money.
> > >
> > > Intent on the part of the user of the term, and how it is received by the
> > > individual addressed are going to be the determining factors as to whether,
> > > or not the usage is derogatory.When I see Appleseed used, my first thought
> > > is
> > > that it is intended to be derogatory, and provocative.
> > >
> > > Appleseed is not a term used by users of Apple products to describe
> > > themselves. It is a term used by non-Apple users to label Apple users. While
> > > you might not have intended your usage to be derogatory, you have used it to
> > > segregate/differentiate yourself from Apple users, and to establish your
> > > standing as somebody who uses a different OS (...and I know you own and use
> > > an iphone).If I were you I would stop calling your friends Appleseeds
> > > regardless of how good APPL has been for you.
> > >
> > > In the case of Mayayana, and his anti-Apple bias, his usage of Appleseed is
> > > undoubtably, and intentionally derogatory. He has a similar anti-Adobe bias.
> >
> > along with anti-microsoft, anti-google, anti-yahoo, anti-facebook,
> > anti-aol and many more.
> >
> > sum it up as anti-everything.
> 
> Does that include anti-Twitter, and anti-Hupmobile?

and what about anti-matter !