From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.166.201 with SMTP id p192mr6072084qke.9.1513808025070;
Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:13:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!m31no4766590qtf.0!news-out.google.com!t48ni1778qtc.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx41.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Message-ID: <k2ol3dtpjbmt7ut4njjomvco7mbfeulir0@4ax.com>
References: <p19qv4$1f8c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172047100279%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p19rs6$1gce$1@gioia.aioe.org> <181220172123331269%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1b4qj$17kh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <191220171145292036%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1cq8k013i9@news3.newsguy.com> <0001HW.1FEA299601123D5970000EED02CF@news.giganews.com> <201220170029101376%nospam@nospam.invalid> <0001HW.1FEA2F0B011384C570000EED02CF@news.giganews.com> <2bfc4eb2-5954-4381-9fb4-3c53ee2927b6@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 58
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:13:46 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 3647
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1040839452
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 3503
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 03:01:12 -0800 (PST), Whisky-dave<whisky.dave@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 05:39:30 UTC, Savageduck  wrote:
>> On Dec 19, 2017, nospam wrote
>> (in article<201220170029101376%nospam@nospam.invalid>):
>> 
>> > In article<0001HW.1FEA299601123D5970000EED02CF@news.giganews.com>,
>> > Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>  wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Being mean to people is not a game. It's just being
>> > > > > > mean. You demean yourself and coarsen your own
>> > > > > > sensibility, regardless of whether it bothers the target.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > think about that next time you call people 'apple seeds' and other
>> > > > > derogatory terms.
>> > > >
>> > > > I don't consider calling someone an Appleseed if a derogatory term. I
>> > > > have some personal friends who I call Appleseeds, regularly. Yet some
>> > > > got very insulted when I mentioned I called Apple Support, instead of
>> > > > them. Also in my capacity as a stockholder, I love Appleseeds. They have
>> > > > made me and my daughters, a lot of money.
>> > >
>> > > Intent on the part of the user of the term, and how it is received by the
>> > > individual addressed are going to be the determining factors as to whether,
>> > > or not the usage is derogatory.When I see Appleseed used, my first thought
>> > > is
>> > > that it is intended to be derogatory, and provocative.
>> > >
>> > > Appleseed is not a term used by users of Apple products to describe
>> > > themselves. It is a term used by non-Apple users to label Apple users. While
>> > > you might not have intended your usage to be derogatory, you have used it to
>> > > segregate/differentiate yourself from Apple users, and to establish your
>> > > standing as somebody who uses a different OS (...and I know you own and use
>> > > an iphone).If I were you I would stop calling your friends Appleseeds
>> > > regardless of how good APPL has been for you.
>> > >
>> > > In the case of Mayayana, and his anti-Apple bias, his usage of Appleseed is
>> > > undoubtably, and intentionally derogatory. He has a similar anti-Adobe bias.
>> >
>> > along with anti-microsoft, anti-google, anti-yahoo, anti-facebook,
>> > anti-aol and many more.
>> >
>> > sum it up as anti-everything.
>> 
>> Does that include anti-Twitter, and anti-Hupmobile?
>
>and what about anti-matter !

And antidisestablishmenttarianism?

.... or antipodes?
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens