From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:36:34 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <201220171736347927%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <00942a15-c476-4273-9671-c1ef61328784@googlegroups.com> <p0rg46$1tqe$1@gioia.aioe.org> <131220171132354803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <d8ec4ebe-4153-448c-a71b-43f86105871c@googlegroups.com> <181220171608156123%nospam@nospam.invalid> <e2bafadf-81f6-45a2-bd23-34a8dc0ed858@googlegroups.com> <p19er6$101g$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f6jg3d1m0i3rtes3tmhtvgs68ul7a6jp12@4ax.com> <p19rj5$1fqt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4i1h3dt7mmqip10247v98c9u35ceg8pafv@4ax.com> <p1a1a9$1m3j$1@gioia.aioe.org> <vqol3d5a6n9o0ldaki2gmft3gn8odkpkg3@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="41d49268fda13b210f8e9232fcd0a523";
logging-data="29610"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jIejx4olzUMn+Q0QABTAd"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tx/68S+Rqdwc+YsUtQLVt0j+1tU=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<vqol3d5a6n9o0ldaki2gmft3gn8odkpkg3@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

> >
> >| I never had CS. Over the years I variously had Gimp, ... PhotoPaint,
> >| Paintshop Pro, NIK, DxO and various plug ins to extend them. Updates
> >| kept arriving and no matter what I had at the time it still cost me
> >| money to keep them up todate. The costs were accumulating and when CC
> >| arrived I leapt at it.
> >|
> >
> >   That's what I don't get. Why did you need to keep
> >buying updates? I don't find that I'm missing functionality.
> >I guess if I bought a new camera I might have to buy a
> >new Aftershot Pro to get RAW support, but aside from
> >that, I have PSP 5 and 16, and most of the time I don't
> >even need the latter. 
> 
> There is another point which has been mentioned. Even though an update
> may not appear to bring any new functions it normally is that one or
> more functions in an update provide a better outcome than in the
> previous version. Also, even without changes in functionality,
> software improvements will result in better performance and take
> advantage of improvements in more recent hardware architecture.

tl;dr - bug fixes, security updates, and support for new hardware.

> Of course if you only want the hard core basics you can continue to
> use software originally written for a 286.

which is all he does. he still runs xp, after all.