From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.57.5 with SMTP id s5mr7058390qtb.29.1513856412620;
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 03:40:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.170.1 with SMTP id t1mr964003vke.4.1513856412488; Thu, 21
Dec 2017 03:40:12 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g35no5072185qtk.1!news-out.google.com!t48ni2030qtc.1!nntp.google.com!m31no5092939qtf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 03:40:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <cgtl3dtks2n2b13ccogge6ohe7rv32gjt8@4ax.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <33e7625e-8c31-47f9-9523-6c65af05aa7c@googlegroups.com>
<6rkg3ddh49uj96ual0l6ee4vddb3vnnr3u@4ax.com> <p19qv4$1f8c$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<181220172047100279%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p19rs6$1gce$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<181220172123331269%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1b4qj$17kh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<191220171145292036%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p1cq8k013i9@news3.newsguy.com>
<p1dsh3$1837$1@gioia.aioe.org> <v4jl3d596mhssdi8th98ohb0oa3942aje6@4ax.com>
<p1empl$m2o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cgtl3dtks2n2b13ccogge6ohe7rv32gjt8@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <39cbac49-5500-4547-8a87-eecd1ea2782c@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:40:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 3401
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1781607006
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 23:54:27 UTC, Bill W  wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:03:22 -0500, "Mayayana"
><mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> 
> >"Bill W"<nothing@nowhere.com> wrote
> >
> >| >  The sad part is that he's now on a very limited
> >| >retirement income, yet has gone into credit card
> >| >debt in order to buy a new Mac when he could have
> >| >had a new Windows PC for $300.
> >|
> >| ... and he could spend about half of his remaining life trying to keep
> >| it working. In other words, yes, I just spent another full day dealing
> >| with a Windows laptop problem.
> >
> >  Actually he's handy with Windows. He just
> >likes Macs. Funny guy. A Mac, an Internet
> >connection, wine and a pack of Camel non-
> >filters is all he craves. The rest -- including
> >food and housing -- is gravy.
> >
> >   It sounds like you need someone
> >who knows computers. Windows is not as
> >easy as Mac, but if you're spending "yet
> >another day" fixing it then there's something
> >wrong. 
> 
> I'm pretty sure I know more about Windows than about 99% of users. I
> have never in my life paid anyone for help with a Windows PC, and
> called for tech support maybe twice in the last 25 years. And I have
> never once reinstalled Windows to repair a problem. I actually fix the
> problems instead of using that sort of workaround. The problems I get
> stuck on tend to be pretty bizarre, and no repair facility would even
> think of trying to find a fix outside of formatting and reinstalling. 
> 
> The problem is exactly what you said - there is something wrong, but
> it's with Windows. A simple hard drive clone that keeps reporting
> source disk errors has me stumped.

Maybe you're cloning the error too. Like replacing a worn car tyre with another worn car tyre.