From: Bill W <>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
From: Bill W <>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:07:33 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <p1dsh3$1837$> <> <p1empl$m2o$> <> <> <p1gb1b$rhc$> <> <p1hlvs$1039$> <211220172012447438%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <p1hvrb$1efg$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="012756e2ba1621cc86196b36397f4736";
logging-data="10054"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uHxcsOhI2VXfEtOtU3VPQvvn8zZGSYgk="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S1elJEkd19Wq58DKLORIhhmN+Zo=
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:56:16 -0500, "Mayayana"<mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

>"Bill W"<> wrote
>| Well I did what any reasonable person would not do, and continued with
>| the science experiment. I downloaded some free SMART reading software,
>| and there are 30 current pending sectors. Googling that, what seemed
>| to appear in every result was "replace the drive now". So I guess I
>| will.
>   If you're thinking of getting an SSD anyway then
>it's no harm done, but I wouldn't put much faith in SMART.
>I had a WD drive recently that went bad. The WD utility
>found it. some others didn't. SMART was no help at all. 

I already bought the SSD days ago. The plan was if it didn't do much
for the laptop, it was going into another PC that would benefit from
it. $150 for 500 GB was a decent enough price to get me to the store.
I did want it to go a bit more smoothly, though.