From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Adobe Stock Images pays photo $0.18 for using his photo
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:11:22 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <211220172311220529%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <p1cq8k013i9@news3.newsguy.com> <p1dsh3$1837$1@gioia.aioe.org> <v4jl3d596mhssdi8th98ohb0oa3942aje6@4ax.com> <p1empl$m2o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cgtl3dtks2n2b13ccogge6ohe7rv32gjt8@4ax.com> <39cbac49-5500-4547-8a87-eecd1ea2782c@googlegroups.com> <p1gb1b$rhc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cbjo3d9s2lvpbbc90fhdn4r3vhs29bcn48@4ax.com> <p1hlvs$1039$1@gioia.aioe.org> <211220172012447438%nospam@nospam.invalid> <futo3d997kdia8chdhgo8ll9cqn5pkd8bh@4ax.com> <211220172238201594%nospam@nospam.invalid> <brvo3d1uspqem4uiigltrahk4o6t9f1u74@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="54124412e930bb42687ba9eda47d046d";
logging-data="12457"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19eoJMkf6bmURueAM+OErEY"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kDGraBBaE+1cC7nPgMU/l0RWbA0=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<brvo3d1uspqem4uiigltrahk4o6t9f1u74@4ax.com>, Bill W<nothing@nowhere.com> wrote:

> >> Getting back on-topic, SSD's and more memory to help with photo
> >> editing have been discussed many times on this group. LR is very slow
> >> on this laptop when doing demanding tasks, such as spot removal when
> >> the "spot" is very big. I'm maxed out at 8 GB memory, and I was going
> >> to find out just how much difference the SSD would make, and then post
> >> the results here. It should be of some interest to some people. If it
> >> will rejuvenate an old laptop, people can save money considering the
> >> low prices of the drives these days. 
> >
> >an ssd can make a *huge* difference in performance, even though it's
> >still bottlenecked by sata.
> >
> >also keep in mind that depending on the sata controller in the system,
> >some ssds may not negotiate the fastest possible speeds.
> 
> That's my main concern. There are no updates for the hardware that I
> can find.

the one with which i'm familiar is actually a hardware bug with the
nvidia sata controller and certain firmware on some ssds (notably
sandforce controllers), where the link speed may negotiate to sata i
speeds even though both are spec'ed for higher. it still works, just
not as fast it it could.

> In fact, Toshiba doesn't even support the laptop for Win
> 8.1, much less 10, so it is dated, even though it came with Win 7
> installed. Which brings up another concern - when I installed 10
> anyway, I spent a lot of time finding drivers to get things working
> again. It might be different with the most recent versions of 10,
> though. 

win8 drivers should still work in win10, but as with everything
windows, you just never know.