From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Quandry - keep old camera?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.233.214.13 with SMTP id r13mr10813589qkk.26.1514008883607;
Fri, 22 Dec 2017 22:01:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.170.1 with SMTP id t1mr1470241vke.4.1514008883380; Fri,
22 Dec 2017 22:01:23 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g35no743152qtk.1!news-out.google.com!t48ni366qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no743142qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 22:01:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.1FE9B1DB00F62DE470000C1F02CF@news.giganews.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.0.172; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.0.172
References: <f9s5ehFm1a6U1@mid.individual.net> <49e67142-7568-4439-b7b8-ec2a498e0fe4@googlegroups.com>
<f9snjoFq7vsU1@mid.individual.net> <f9t65lFtlclU1@mid.individual.net> <0001HW.1FE9B1DB00F62DE470000C1F02CF@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <02e3e1a4-24a2-4f4a-8dfc-a68161b204a8@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Quandry - keep old camera?
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 06:01:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 48
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 15:45:28 UTC-5, Savageduck  wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2017, Paul Carmichael wrote
> (in article<f9t65lFtlclU1@mid.individual.net>):
> 
> > On 19/12/17 15:55, Paul Carmichael wrote:
> >
> > > https://www.foto24.com/objetivo-samyang-14mm-f-2-8-if-ed-umc-aspheri...
> > > r-gran-angular.html
> >
> > Except if you add canon mount it rises to 525 euros.
> >
> > Anyone here know if there's any difference between that and this:
> >
> > https://www.amazon.es/gp/product/B004CS2VMQ?tag=thedigitalp0d-21
> >
> > ?
> 
> After your last experience buying your new camera, I would be wary of what 
> those Spanish site tell you.
> 
> To start with those are over priced for Samyang lenses. The Canon mount 
> Samyang 14mm UW f/2.8 IF UD UMC is available at B&H for $279. The Foto24 site 
> is showing the correct lens at $51 more than it should be.
> 
> Samyang also have a much more expensive, slightly faster XP 14mm f/2.4, still 
> manual-focus for $999.
> 
> The Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 FE is not a Canon mount. It is an auto-focus lens 
> for the Sony E-mount and that sells at B&H for $699.
> 
> It looks as though that Spanish Amazon site is trying to screw you by showing 
> a picture of the correct lens, but with the wrong model number. My Spanish is 
> nonexistant, so I am not sure what they are claiming.
> 
> There are no Canon mount Samyang auto-focus lenses, so if you see the AF 
> prefix it will not fit your camera. All the Canon mount Samyang lenses are 
> all manual.
> 
> Go to the Samyang site and see for yourself.
> 
> <https://www.samyanglensglobal.com/product/detail.do>
> <https://www.samyanglensglobal.com>
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> Savageduck

Or get a Rokinon 10mm f/2.8 for $330 or so. Supposedly a very good lens.