From: RichA <>
Subject: Re: Weirdness of camera pricing
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id m184mr15682759qke.56.1514350301088;
Tue, 26 Dec 2017 20:51:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id u69mr2527295vkb.11.1514350300652; Tue,
26 Dec 2017 20:51:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 20:51:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p1v6hq$7o0$>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
References: <> <p1v6hq$7o0$>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Weirdness of camera pricing
From: RichA <>
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 04:51:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 16
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 23:11:40 UTC-5, Noons  wrote:
> On 26/12/2017 2:16 @wiz, RichA wrote:
> > Olympus's E-M10III, a lesser camera than the E-M5II, is now $100.00 more expensive (in Canada)
because of discounts on the E-M5II. This kind of price difference is the strange part of the camera
world.  Pentax's admittedly overpriced KP costs more than the vastly higher-spec'd K3II.  Age of
models is the key thing here. Though you don't see this happening much with Canon an Nikon and Sony
has so many models that they all blur at the mid-end.
> > 
> And that is why I've jumped off thios madness of constant upgrading.
> My current digital camera is a EM5II and it will stay that way for a 
> looooong time!

After seeing the modest differences between the 16mp and 20mp sensors, I tend to agree.  The E-M5II
still has class-leading IBIS as well.