From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Subject: Re: Tamron wants to thank you for being a loyal buyer
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 21:09:40 -0600
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 19:09:40 -0800
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.1FF497F40384177270000EAFC2CF@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Tamron wants to thank you for being a loyal buyer
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <5181eae8-11d0-40a1-ac42-f32cd188483f@googlegroups.com> <fai7j6FneopU1@mid.individual.net> <271220171343371451%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p2112l0gag@news7.newsguy.com> <271220171623347269%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p21l0t0s0q@news7.newsguy.com>
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Y7CzxqiAAf39CtF1A9tT3KikIqlPhpzKzeoK3UW7S7QGnJe3pVqcmZxI0IllsQVokXw1QDJx3R9iHUK!cKoF/GrUrCgqkhDqtneadB3i4XId2EiMr9AnYWTmIDvdpAGb393ObD9ar9EKK2U8SUZ3SWh+hK3+!22JTi+QA9/U=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2261
Print Article
Forward Article
On Dec 27, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article<p21l0t0s0q@news7.newsguy.com>):

> On 12/27/2017 4:23 PM, nospam wrote:
> > In article<p2112l0gag@news7.newsguy.com>, PeterN
> > <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>  wrote:
> >
> > > > > Do they have four worth having?
> > > >
> > > > yes
> > >
> > > Which ones.
> >
> > 90mm macro is a classic, with outstanding image quality. highly
> > recommended. the newer version is stabilized, while purists prefer the
> > original. 180mm macro also a classic and also highly recommended.
> > 28-75mm is inexpensive and excellent for the price, especially for aps.
> > 200-500mm is also excellent.
>
> Compared to what. Produce your own test images, not those of someone who
> may very well be a shill.
>
> My Cord was a classic, just before I totaled it..

....and for that automotive crime you should have been punished severely!

<https://www.dropbox.com/s/9vt5rp5x5ez9l84/DNC3479Aw.jpg>

-- 

Regards,
Savageduck