Subject: Re: Tamron wants to thank you for being a loyal buyer
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Tamron wants to thank you for being a loyal buyer
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:43:41 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <p240eo0l0c@news6.newsguy.com>
References: <5181eae8-11d0-40a1-ac42-f32cd188483f@googlegroups.com>
<fai7j6FneopU1@mid.individual.net> <271220171343371451%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p2112l0gag@news7.newsguy.com> <271220171623347269%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p21l0t0s0q@news7.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FF497F40384177270000EAFC2CF@news.giganews.com>
<p21sq402sdo@news6.newsguy.com> <set84dd4nb82oraevhf8it7f8a7cl02fjk@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p1ca2741d0a5d3e10cb4510e3284a7d498f6a0924c52fe618.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.2
In-Reply-To: <set84dd4nb82oraevhf8it7f8a7cl02fjk@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 947700569
X-Received-Bytes: 2958
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/27/2017 11:49 PM, Bill W wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 23:29:25 -0500, PeterN 
> <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
> 
>> I will not play BJ where they have changed the rule so that a
>> dealer must draw on a soft 17. In a six deck game, WITH DOUBLE
>> AFTER SPLITTING ALLOWED, It increases the house edge from about
>> .41% to .63%. If you doubt me, do the math for yourself.
> 
> If the house has any edge, why bother playing at all? And no one 
> actually does the math on this. These days they look it up, but it
> was established with simulations, not a calculator.
> 
> Anyway, that change to hit soft 17 will cost only another $22 after 
> $10,000 of betting. Who cares? At a full table, you'd play 3-4 hours 
> at $100 per hand and lose $63 instead of $41. It's not even worth 
> thinking about. You're just gambling either way, and if you're
> betting that much, $22 means nothing.
> 

The casino owners love that type of thinking.
In my playing days, we considered gambling money as entertainment. We 
would set aside a certain amount of money. When that money was gone we 
would not enter a enter a casino until the following year. My wife loved 
the slot machines, I never enjoyed playing them.
To answer your comment, more completely, I don't care if your was of 
thinking is right. I play for enjoyment. The rule change bothers me and 
detracts from my enjoyment. If it doesn't bother you, great. play all 
your heart desires. I have come to a high preference for poker. When 
poker players are much better than me, I usually have the option of 
switching tables. I also have the option of walking away, and some 
casinos even let me use my camera.

-- 
PeterN