From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces several lawsuits
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces several lawsuits
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:52:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <281220172052532748%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <7e2b9f49-3935-4bae-9b68-f6084d68faac@googlegroups.com> <p240ug0l5j@news6.newsguy.com> <ccf249d5-678c-42cc-8afe-c06d83af5ad9@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="300f26362d5282ca47382ca56edef46f";
logging-data="3530"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+g+QgszuGNI1FBf7ypJd7b"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y7i17RGufZpZcEMeHCR4yVuhMEs=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<ccf249d5-678c-42cc-8afe-c06d83af5ad9@googlegroups.com>,
RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> That doing what they did was a mistake?  I don't CARE how the battery ages,
> I'm more concerned about the performance of the device.  Batteries (at a
> price) can be replaced, poor productivity costs more.

what they did was extend the useful life of the device with fewer
interruptions due to sudden shutdown from an aging battery, a physical
property of batteries that cannot be avoided.

*lots* of products do the same or similar.