Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces severallawsuits
Full headers:
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces several
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:05:18 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<p248eo$k65$> <281220172121547215%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <p249kd$lh1$>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4277132358
X-Received-Bytes: 2156
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/28/2017 9:34 PM, Mayayana wrote:
> "nospam"<nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote
> |
> | more nonsense. the iphone x (not 10)
>     Do you know what x stands for? (Hint: Roman.)
> | is selling *very* well.
>    But don't worry. Once it gets down to $40 I'll buy one
> to use as a camera... if they can demonstrate to me
> that the camera is usable without activating the phone.
You and I are not Apple's target customer for watches. I suspect that 
few here are, regardless of whether they own one.
Just because I own an iPhone8+ doesn't mean I am a target customer.



Target customers are and should be a moving target, to stimulate growth: