Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces severallawsuits
On 12/28/2017 9:50 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Mayayana
>> | more nonsense. the iphone x (not 10)
>> Do you know what x stands for? (Hint: Roman.)
> the name of the device is iphone x, not iphone 10.
>> | is selling *very* well.
> that's nothing more than the usual analysts talking out their ass in an
> attempt to manipulate the stock price for personal gain and that of
> their clients.
> last october, the same idiot analysts were saying the iphone 8/8+ were
> a flop, that lines were short and no backlog of orders, it's not enough
> of a jump over the 7 so people were opting for the 7 instead, little to
> no customer excitement, blah blah blah.
> at the earnings call in early november, apple stated the iphone 8/8+
> were the two most popular models sold. the iphone x had not yet shipped
> at that point.
> it happens every quarter.
> apple's next earnings call is in mid-february, where *actual* numbers
> will be announced.
>> But don't worry. Once it gets down to $40 I'll buy one
>> to use as a camera...
> you wouldn't use one if it was given to you for free.
>> if they can demonstrate to me
>> that the camera is usable without activating the phone.
> there is *no* need to activate an iphone with cellular service.
> you'll just need wifi for any connectivity (and you can also turn that
> off if you prefer).
> older iphones are commonly given to kids for exactly that purpose,
> since the parents don't want to sign them up for their own cellphone
I do not disagree with much of what you say. but, back up what you say
with authenticated facts, and logic.
You really ought to distinguish fact from opinion. You would gain a lot
of respect, if you did.