Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces severallawsuits
Full headers:
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces several
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 12:09:45 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<p248eo$k65$> <281220172121547215%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p249kd$lh1$> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <p24g9b$tgu$>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1503129971
X-Received-Bytes: 2816
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/28/2017 11:28 PM, Mayayana wrote:
> "PeterN" <"peter,newdelete"> wrote
> | You and I are not Apple's target customer for watches. I suspect that
> | few here are, regardless of whether they own one.
> | Just because I own an iPhone8+ doesn't mean I am a target customer.
> |
> | <>
> |
> |
> <
> |
>    It's not about whether I'm a target customer. It's the market
> trend and has been for awhile. And not just with Apple:
>    If there were a market I expect Apple would rule it. But
> some things are just too dumb. They tried to create a market
> because the idea of a whole new gadget market was appealing.
> There's not much more logic than that.
>    On the other hand, why shouldn't I be a target customer?
> Most people now use computer phones. A computer watch
> is presumably supposed to complement a computer phone.
> But of course it doesn't. Even if it could accurately count
> my footsteps that's an absurd function. I thought pedometers
> were clever when I was 10 years old.
>     If the target market is high income 30-somethings who
> want a watch for "self expression" then that's another way
> of pointing out that the emperor has no clothes.... Or in
> this case, that the watch has no function.

If I was the target market, my iPhone would have a built in, or 
available oximeter.