Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces severallawsuits
Full headers:
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces several
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 12:17:06 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 90
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<p248eo$k65$> <281220172121547215%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p249kd$lh1$> <>
<p24g9b$tgu$> <281220172342514655%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <281220172342514655%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 4344
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4081468040
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/28/2017 11:42 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article <p24g9b$tgu$>, Mayayana
><mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>> "PeterN" <"peter,newdelete"> wrote
>> | You and I are not Apple's target customer for watches. I suspect that
>> | few here are, regardless of whether they own one.
>> | Just because I own an iPhone8+ doesn't mean I am a target customer.
>> |
>>    It's not about whether I'm a target customer. It's the market
>> trend and has been for awhile. And not just with Apple:
>> s-2017-12
> android smartwatches are mostly a failure, with some makers exiting the
> market.
> meanwhile, the apple watch and fitness trackers are a huge success.
>>    If there were a market I expect Apple would rule it.
> and they do.
> as i linked before:
> <
> er-one-watch-in-the-world-2017-9>
>    The company's CEO Tim Cook told attendees that the tech giant now
>    sells the number one watch in the world, leapfrogging Rolex in the
>    process. Cook also said the Watch saw stunning 50% year over year
>    sales growth in August.
> and from *last* year:
> <>
>    So, just to reiterate one last time and let it really sink in, Apple
>    Watch sales totaled about $6 billion in its first year of existence.
>    Meanwhile, the world¹s foremost luxury watch brand did $4.5 billion
>    in sales across its entire product portfolio last year. In fact, the
>    combined sales of all top Swiss watch makers totaled roughly $20
>    billion in 2015, so Apple is nearly one-third of the way there after
>    just one year.
>>    But
>> some things are just too dumb.
> not as dumb as some people...
>> They tried to create a market
>> because the idea of a whole new gadget market was appealing.
>> There's not much more logic than that.
> apple did not create the wearables market.
> in fact, it's existed for several decades.
>>    On the other hand, why shouldn't I be a target customer?
>> Most people now use computer phones. A computer watch
>> is presumably supposed to complement a computer phone.
>> But of course it doesn't.
> actually, it does.
>> Even if it could accurately count
>> my footsteps that's an absurd function.
> it does that too, and quite a bit more.
>> I thought pedometers
>> were clever when I was 10 years old.
> out of touch with reality, as usual
>>     If the target market is high income 30-somethings who
>> want a watch for "self expression" then that's another way
>> of pointing out that the emperor has no clothes.... Or in
>> this case, that the watch has no function.
> very out of touch.

Glad you know the target market, and statistics to back up that 
information. Last week I spoke to a member of the Apple marketing team, 
it was a corporate secret. BTW what entity is one of the top five 
largest co-marketer with Apple?