Subject: Re: Apple played digital liberal nanny-stater, now faces severallawsuits
On 12/28/2017 11:42 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article <email@example.com>, Mayayana
>> "PeterN" <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote
>> | You and I are not Apple's target customer for watches. I suspect that
>> | few here are, regardless of whether they own one.
>> | Just because I own an iPhone8+ doesn't mean I am a target customer.
>> It's not about whether I'm a target customer. It's the market
>> trend and has been for awhile. And not just with Apple:
> android smartwatches are mostly a failure, with some makers exiting the
> meanwhile, the apple watch and fitness trackers are a huge success.
>> If there were a market I expect Apple would rule it.
> and they do.
> as i linked before:
> The company's CEO Tim Cook told attendees that the tech giant now
> sells the number one watch in the world, leapfrogging Rolex in the
> process. Cook also said the Watch saw stunning 50% year over year
> sales growth in August.
> and from *last* year:
> So, just to reiterate one last time and let it really sink in, Apple
> Watch sales totaled about $6 billion in its first year of existence.
> Meanwhile, the world¹s foremost luxury watch brand did $4.5 billion
> in sales across its entire product portfolio last year. In fact, the
> combined sales of all top Swiss watch makers totaled roughly $20
> billion in 2015, so Apple is nearly one-third of the way there after
> just one year.
>> some things are just too dumb.
> not as dumb as some people...
>> They tried to create a market
>> because the idea of a whole new gadget market was appealing.
>> There's not much more logic than that.
> apple did not create the wearables market.
> in fact, it's existed for several decades.
>> On the other hand, why shouldn't I be a target customer?
>> Most people now use computer phones. A computer watch
>> is presumably supposed to complement a computer phone.
>> But of course it doesn't.
> actually, it does.
>> Even if it could accurately count
>> my footsteps that's an absurd function.
> it does that too, and quite a bit more.
>> I thought pedometers
>> were clever when I was 10 years old.
> out of touch with reality, as usual
>> If the target market is high income 30-somethings who
>> want a watch for "self expression" then that's another way
>> of pointing out that the emperor has no clothes.... Or in
>> this case, that the watch has no function.
> very out of touch.
Glad you know the target market, and statistics to back up that
information. Last week I spoke to a member of the Apple marketing team,
it was a corporate secret. BTW what entity is one of the top five
largest co-marketer with Apple?