Subject: Re: Apple cuts $50 off price for replacment phone batteries,sheepishly offers apology
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id e199mr31019356qka.0.1514834825577;
Mon, 01 Jan 2018 11:27:05 -0800 (PST)
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: Apple cuts $50 off price for replacment phone batteries,
sheepishly offers apology
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 14:26:07 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<291220171624165415%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <010120181334597930%nospam@nospam.invalid>
X-Received-Bytes: 1728
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4057748822
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 1/1/2018 1:34 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN
> <"peter,newdelete"> wrote:
>> i have an 8+. Outside of telephone calls, I notice a slowdown when I use
>> speech to text, and car play.
> based on what metrics?
> and if you *really* think it's slow, take it back and have them test
> it. you're still under warranty.

I plan to. As for metrics, I have been using the hidden Markov formulae 
since 1991. Incorrect interpretations and slow speed of response 
inaccuracy are indicia of power issues.
My 5s was a lot faster in speech to text.