Next <
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: More on the Fujifilm X-T Rumor Front
Full headers:
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: More on the Fujifilm X-T Rumor Front
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:00:40 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: iPpuMV7kUToPimCVqO9OKglSmGkoot3NcMk0LEYHPEN+79iOvZ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jih/cnPLoemNvhEahAuAfd87ex8=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-01-17 06:44:22 +0000, Savageduck said:

> On Jan 16, 2018, android wrote
> (in article<>):
>> On 2018-01-17 03:29:56 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>> It seems that along with the soon to be released X-H1 for the videographers
>>> in the room, there is going to be an X-T3 with a new sensor somewhere
>>> between the current 24MP and less than 30MP.
>>> or
>>> <>
>> Let's hope that it's given a Beyer sensor then.
> Right now it is speculation as to whether or not it will be X-Trans, or
> Bayer. The X-Trans is a signature of the X-Series. However, the GFX MF is a
> Bayer sensor. I guess it is going to depend on what Sony can cook up for them
> off a production line geared up the 24MP X-Trans III. At least it will still
> b e APS-C. That is assuming that this will have a Sony manufactured sensor.

The difference is a mere color pattern on a sheet of plastic. Done in a day...
>> That X-Trans did not pan out that well, it seems...
> seems that is only the naysayers, and non-Fujifilm shooters who feel
> that it did not pan out that well. For those of us who actually shoot with
> X-Trans cameras there is no problem. I for one have been satisfied with my
> X-E2 (X-Trans II), and both the X-T2,&  X-E3 (X-Trans III).

There seem to be quite a few returning to the Canon base...
teleportation kills