Subject: Re: Guy uses a $3000 camera but a crappy Chinese microscope to shoot videos
On Thursday, 18 January 2018 05:08:42 UTC-5, Whisky-dave wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 22:28:33 UTC, RichA wrote:
> > God, at least get used Nikon, Leitz, Olympus or Zeiss microscope! The images are mediocre.
> I agree that it's not brillant and not that impressive, but the depth of field is the problem NOT
the quality of the optics. Of course someone could seel you a $10k lens and tell you you'd get
better results and you may well be fooled by them.
> But in a recent doicumentry series on BBC 1 with david attenborough filming ants, they need to get
really close and have a hiogh depth of field so they brought a ~$8 lens off amazon/ebay and used
that on the end of their £1000s filming rig.
DOF is an issue, but there isn't much you can do about it with video. However, there is an issue
with the optics, they were probably plan-achro objectives which are horrible for photography.