Subject: Re: The Race for The FF MILC is ON!
Full headers:
From: David Taylor <>
Subject: Re: The Race for The FF MILC is ON!
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:51:17 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <p41rb5$g77$>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:51:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="20e9c671509ead7ff298e4532431adaf";
logging-data="16615"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+673t1aW9PRVfoEIq68qUVMF45Rj1d2+Q="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-GB
Cancel-Lock: sha1:w/C6PPG4YjhPDMolW7O5bBKXTC4=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 20/01/2018 16:30, android wrote:
> We've heard 'bout the Nikon Z FF mount 16mm flange! Could be a winner... 
> But now Canon seem to be entering the game with a FF EOS M!!! 18mm 
> flange but the concept is proven!!!
> <>
> What is "Flange"?
> <>

Personally, I don't see sufficient advantage in full-frame MILC if new 
lenses are required.  Is the size and weight reduction a significant 
gain?  What else?

For my own needs MFT is quite adequate, and I could never go back to FF.