From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 19:31:23 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <210120181931235442%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <ZH49C.360796$qG4.136583@fx20.fr7> <p430oq$1c3m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="13538711eae850ddde45cbd3b4e655ed";
logging-data="16697"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yRQH/h/7eAGARDUXZtkg8"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nrgy7NG4pdgwBZT0UqAhFYLHYSQ=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <p430oq$1c3m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ken Hart<kwhart1@frontier.com> wrote:

> Second, those creases may show up less depending on which way you turn 
> the photo in the scanner, so try four scans rotating the photo a 
> quarter-turn for each one. Pick the best.

even if that did make a difference (it won't), only two orientations
would be needed.