From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:45:23 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <220120181045236215%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <ZH49C.360796$qG4.136583@fx20.fr7> <> <_xn9C.449811$6_2.43059@fx30.fr7>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="13538711eae850ddde45cbd3b4e655ed";
logging-data="911"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++aB6SPYWSLJktyMRKmxQF"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QcimAJcAgoOe3/BKBcwpvFIZUpQ=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <_xn9C.449811$6_2.43059@fx30.fr7>, David B.<> wrote:

> Thank you so much for your link. I've been there to have a quick look 
> and have also enroled on the forum. I'll be returning for sure!

those poor people.

> I've always thought that Photoshop is for 'professionals', not for 
> everyday 'home users' like me.

it is.

there is a consumer version, however, called photoshop elements.

you don't need either one.

> Is it something that would make a world 
> of difference over the facilities now included with Apple's 'Photos' 
> software?

it would if you know how to use it. otherwise, hell no.

> I did once experiment with GIMP on my old iMac but found it rather 
> complicated to use. Perhaps it's an age thing! ;-)

nope. it's that the gimp is poorly designed, with no attention paid to