From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Full headers:
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:23:06 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <>
References: <ZH49C.360796$qG4.136583@fx20.fr7> <> <> <WZq9C.649714$Pi3.325238@fx24.fr7> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: wSbVpYFFDy3Yg+XDMvmW5QuTHjMQ+Hb3PU30qR//LUxQapKYRI
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DHBUwFUsT09sJLsBm2xVtSDo+bM=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-01-23 11:37:15 +0000, Whisky-dave said:

> On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 10:32:27 UTC, Savageduck  wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2018, android wrote
>> (in article<>):
>>> Here you go. I set focus to 1.4 and cropped it a bit... 5min tops! :-))
>>> <
>> That is what you get when you use crappy software. How could you possibly
>> think that, that effort was close to being a fix, or restoration of the
>> original?
> To me it looks more like the photograph had been re-photographed with 
> the original print not flat.

I did write in my original reply that the file was useless, or next to. 
There seem to be some crummy shutter roll in it. The picture seem to be 
torn like a less successful pano can. I think that the soft does that 
that most iPhotogs crave! :-))

teleportation kills