Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
On Jan 23, 2018, android wrote
> On 2018-01-23 11:37:15 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> > On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 10:32:27 UTC, Savageduck wrote:
> > > On Jan 22, 2018, android wrote
> > > (in article<fco5peFne0mU1@mid.individual.net>):
> > > > Here you go. I set focus to 1.4 and cropped it a bit... 5min tops! )
> > > >
> > > > <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/g2sv88xj7v5axqv/EzvSHgH_Fotor.jp...
> > >
> > > That is what you get when you use crappy software. How could you possibly
> > > think that, that effort was close to being a fix, or restoration of the
> > > original?
> > To me it looks more like the photograph had been re-photographed with
> > the original print not flat.
> I did write in my original reply that the file was useless, or next to.
> There seem to be some crummy shutter roll in it. The picture seem to be
> torn like a less successful pano can. I think that the soft does that
> that most iPhotogs crave! )
That is what happens when you use the camera in an iPad, which has an
electronic shutter, with the subject (the old photo) under artificial light.