Next <
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 06:39:59 -0600
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 04:39:59 -0800
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.2017649F022A6BE070000769A2CF@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Renovation of a photograph
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <ZH49C.360796$qG4.136583@fx20.fr7> <fcmkc9FcpbdU1@mid.individual.net> <fcmlcjFd120U1@mid.individual.net> <WZq9C.649714$Pi3.325238@fx24.fr7> <fco5peFne0mU1@mid.individual.net> <0001HW.201746B0022367EF70000769A2CF@news.giganews.com> <68a7d25f-b77e-4b61-a57d-1c3ff1456df6@googlegroups.com> <fconpaFrhjmU1@mid.individual.net>
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-BZOgLn9qwETP9YjRzLRqSHqUeb38mFUDwVs2RpEmR/g7nglbx6APwvsLf8PoXuDQR2lrLPwxF2dB2/d!9XtvmERIprkTp/rEbzPlb6fgGukc3hI8RnHle/ww6C5gZcOb74wCPnaRnmHSg77MLpGyu4MjR2LU!lbA/AfCec+0=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2608
X-Received-Bytes: 2699
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2910750387
Print Article
Forward Article
On Jan 23, 2018, android wrote
(in article<fconpaFrhjmU1@mid.individual.net>):

> On 2018-01-23 11:37:15 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
>
> > On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 10:32:27 UTC, Savageduck wrote:
> > > On Jan 22, 2018, android wrote
> > > (in article<fco5peFne0mU1@mid.individual.net>):
> >
> >
> > > > Here you go. I set focus to 1.4 and cropped it a bit... 5min tops! :-))
> > > >
> > > > <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/g2sv88xj7v5axqv/EzvSHgH_Fotor.jp...
> > >
> > > That is what you get when you use crappy software. How could you possibly
> > > think that, that effort was close to being a fix, or restoration of the
> > > original?
> >
> > To me it looks more like the photograph had been re-photographed with
> > the original print not flat.
>
> I did write in my original reply that the file was useless, or next to.
> There seem to be some crummy shutter roll in it. The picture seem to be
> torn like a less successful pano can. I think that the soft does that
> that most iPhotogs crave! :-))
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_shutter>

That is what happens when you use the camera in an iPad, which has an 
electronic shutter, with the subject (the old photo) under artificial light.

-- 

Regards,
Savageduck