From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: This amazing wilderness timelapse of Canada took 6 weeks to shootand 9 months to edit
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.18.129 with SMTP id y1mr4912061qti.55.1516812129759;
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:42:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.50.209 with SMTP id y200mr708214vky.3.1516812129441; Wed,
24 Jan 2018 08:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!s47no117115qta.0!news-out.google.com!e39ni3148qtk.1!nntp.google.com!i22no115296qta.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:42:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fcrqtlFj3csU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <sandman-b64cf1e5968270b4bca9d1f61a262a41@individual.net>
<372ba064-d637-4fba-911b-8bcf352b89d7@googlegroups.com> <ac3835aa-0011-4e69-bae5-ff7e520855b5@googlegroups.com>
<fcrkrbFhmi6U1@mid.individual.net> <a9cf0789-f172-4df3-a234-c41b5eec598a@googlegroups.com>
<fcrqtlFj3csU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4b840ed6-4eef-46b9-8581-42943b6adb0b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: This amazing wilderness timelapse of Canada took 6 weeks to shoot
and 9 months to edit
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:42:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 98
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 16:35:10 UTC, android  wrote:
> On 2018-01-24 15:54:45 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> 
> > On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 14:51:33 UTC, android  wrote:
> >> On 2018-01-24 13:26:42 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> >> 
> >>> On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 11:57:25 UTC, android  wrote:
> >>>> On 2018-01-24 10:08:24 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 06:24:51 UTC, Sandman  wrote:
> >>>>>> <https://www.diyphotography.net/amazing-wilderness-timelapse-canada-t...
> >>>>>> weeks-shoot-9-months-edit>
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> "Every once in a while, a timelapse comes along that just takes
> >>>>>> your breath away. You could take almost any frame from such films
> >>>>>> and it stands up on its own as a still photography. Alive, by
> >>>>>> German filmmaker Florian “Flo” Nick, is one such timelapse
> >>>>>> film. It was shot over 5,500km travelled in six weeks exploring the
> >>>>>> vast landscapes of Alberta and British Columbia. And it’s is
> >>>>>> absolutely beautiful."
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Sandman
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> As yet I've not been able to find out what process i.e software he> >>> 
> >>>>> used> > for this, plenty of info on what cameras and lenses, maybe 
> >>>>> I've> >>> missed> > it.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Beneath the fourth slide:
> >>>> 
> >>>> "For the footage, Flo used his Sony A7SII along with Canon 16-35mm 
> >>>> f/4>> >> and Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 lenses. For the night shots, he also 
> >>>> used a>> >> Pentax-X 50mm f/1.7 and 100mm f/2.8.  He says that motion 
> >>>> control>> >> camera movement was done using the eMotimo Spectrum ST4 
> >>>> and ifootage>> >> Shark slider"
> >>> 
> >>> No not really that just list what he used over the 6 weeks to capture> 
> >>> > the images.
> >> 
> >> Oki... I kind of deleted my reply to your post within minutes after posting...
> >>> 
> >>> "Alive took 9 months for Flo to create once he got back home with all> 
> >>> > the images."
> >>> 
> >>> So 6 weeks to capture the images and 9 months to edit them, I doubt he> 
> >>> > was using a slow compter perhaps he used a phone to edit them 
> >>> together> > this is what I was wondering about as it took 9 months.
> >>> 
> >>> So much more time was spent putting the images together than taking them.
> >>> 
> >>> which is unusual, well from what I usually watch timescale wise.
> >> 
> >> A picture usually takes 1/125s to capture so 50000 slides would have> 
> >> taken him 6 min and 40 sec to capture...
> > No, he said that took him 6 weeks not 6 mins.
> 
> He took 50000 slides and a slide is about 1/125s of exposure.

You can't say what exposure was used on those 50000 slides.

Even though he said he took 54,000 images yuo work that out as 50,000 slides

and I doubt any nighttime shots were taken at 1/125th 




> So the 
> time it took him to capture whatever was 50000/125s and that equals 6 
> minutes and 40 seconds! 

No one uses those stats.
 Not wedding photgraphers or sports photographers are paid buy how long the shutter stays open.


>Me mum had deeep concerns 'bout the English 
> educational system. She was a teacher of sorts...

of sorts.