From: David B. <>
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
Full headers:
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
References: <eykaC.618103$SF3.128888@fx28.fr7>
<vxoaC.984608$TX5.937641@fx13.fr7> <250120181241185790%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<cYoaC.633341$r_4.304760@fx27.fr7> <250120181310411596%nospam@nospam.invalid>
From: "David B." <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <250120182139524759%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <EBAaC.779471$675.700429@fx22.fr7>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 07:16:52 UTC
Organization: blocknews -
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 07:16:51 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3060
X-Received-Body-CRC: 963493406
X-Original-Bytes: 3009
Print Article
Forward Article
On 26/01/2018 02:39, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, Tony Cooper
><> wrote:
>>>> Someone in this thread said people were "suckered into" doing the
>>>> restoration.  That person - as evidenced in all of his posts - doesn't
>>>> understand the concept of doing a project like this for someone else
>>>> is an enjoyable challenge to many.  But, then, we all know that he
>>>> participates here only when he wants to argue about something or
>>>> express some form of disagreement.
>>> more ad hominem, which is all you do.
>> If the shoe fits.
> it doesn't fit at all.

Why yes - yes it does!

>>> it has absolutely nothing to do with enjoyable challenges. the original
>>> poster is a troll and you fell for it. simple as that.
>> Q.E.D.  The only reason for this post of yours is to argue or express
>> disagreement.
> your posts today were nothing more than to insult me. they served no
> other purpose.
> i wasn't disagreeing with anyone or anything.

Nonsense. It's what you do.

>> I don't know what David B does in other newsgroups, and don't care.
>> He's done nothing in this newsgroup that bothers me.
> how quickly you forget.
> last summer, he crossposted to a number of irrelevant groups, causing a
> significant disruption here, and i recall you being among those who
> complained.

If I choose to cross-post it is MY business, not yours. No-one is 
obliged to READ what I write.

>> He had a genuine request and a genuine need, and that's all that
>> matters to me.
> those who have seen his posts and antics know it was anything *but*
> genuine.

You are wrong, yet again, 'nospam'.

My request was 100% genuine and I am very pleased with the outcome.

David B.