From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:34:18 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <260120180434188128%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <eykaC.618103$SF3.128888@fx28.fr7> <> <vxoaC.984608$TX5.937641@fx13.fr7> <250120181241185790%nospam@nospam.invalid> <cYoaC.633341$r_4.304760@fx27.fr7> <250120181310411596%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <5EqaC.618136$SF3.197076@fx28.fr7> <> <250120181754363760%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <250120182139524759%nospam@nospam.invalid> <EBAaC.779471$675.700429@fx22.fr7> <260120180337434278%nospam@nospam.invalid> <7kCaC.530046$NT1.81945@fx29.fr7>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="b1a02c4315da93ef2c077870c4c6687f";
logging-data="2840"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QsnFLJTmx5Eb+GLQjKHV2"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cNbxlbJYyoclekkeI081KlFHqSo=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <7kCaC.530046$NT1.81945@fx29.fr7>, David B.<> wrote:

> >> My request was 100% genuine
> > 
> > no it wasn't. your original request claimed to want to learn how to do
> > it yourself. that was bullshit. you had *zero* intention of learning.
> > 
> > when you 'enrolled' (your words) at the photoshop forum, your first
> > question was not about retouching, but how the site made money.
> You are wrong - yet again.
> I asked who was paying to run the forum, and why.

in other words, not wrong.

you went there to troll, not to learn.

> IAMSAM, a moderator, decline to tell me, other than that it is being 
> paid for "by the forum owner".

because it's none of your fucking business.

> You cannot change the truth. Anyone may read what he said at this link:-
> https://www.photosh

as you've been repeatedly told, that requires a login.

> >> and I am very pleased with the outcome.
> > 
> > of course you are, because you mooched off of others.
> I have neither the software nor the experience to achieve what other 
> folk have done.

that's very true.

> The expression "off of" has always been used by those folk who are 
> ill-educated. You are showing your true colours now! :-P

ad hominem.