From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.75.13 with SMTP id y13mr8260054qka.21.1516960584953;
Fri, 26 Jan 2018 01:56:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.180.205 with SMTP id d196mr889091vkf.10.1516960584718;
Fri, 26 Jan 2018 01:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!s47no1291148qta.0!news-out.google.com!e39ni342qtk.1!nntp.google.com!i22no1292898qta.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 01:56:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p4dj5902rn7@news4.newsguy.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <eykaC.618103$SF3.128888@fx28.fr7> <vxoaC.984608$TX5.937641@fx13.fr7>
<250120181241185790%nospam@nospam.invalid> <cYoaC.633341$r_4.304760@fx27.fr7>
<250120181310411596%nospam@nospam.invalid> <fculo7F8jhsU2@mid.individual.net> <p4dj5902rn7@news4.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5720c1aa-3a73-4a92-bb36-4eb75ae358ae@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:56:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2223
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1179027811
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 21:45:23 UTC, PeterN  wrote:
> On 1/25/2018 1:25 PM, android wrote:
> > On 2018-01-25 18:10:41 +0000, nospam said:
> > 
> >> In article <cYoaC.633341$r_4.304760@fx27.fr7>, David B.
> >><DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> I don't think I've told you that my sister is an artist. She'll be
> >>>>> enthrawled when I show her this video!
> >>>>
> >>>> then why didn't you have her retouch your photo?
> >>>
> >>> I'm sure she could do a first class job of so-doing but we're working
> >>> here on photography, not art.
> >>
> >> photography is art
> > 
> > Not always...
> 
> Not that endless debate is photography an art, or a craft.
> Why not a lot of each.

How about a science with all the talk of which type of sensors, circles of confusion, f numbers and
fractions as shutter speeds, I think photography is a science not art just like cooking ;-D

> 
> -- 
> PeterN