From: David B. <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer04.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx09.fr7.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <eykaC.618103$SF3.128888@fx28.fr7>
<0001HW.201A1DF802CDDB977000008DA2CF@news.giganews.com>
<vxoaC.984608$TX5.937641@fx13.fr7> <250120181241185790%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<cYoaC.633341$r_4.304760@fx27.fr7> <250120181310411596%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<n38k6ddesa2aot7alagg8g7od8tego8odd@4ax.com>
<5EqaC.618136$SF3.197076@fx28.fr7>
<28fk6dluumli4d2cqcqvdhhqkdvqfafft7@4ax.com>
<250120181754363760%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<gi2l6dljuepc9jgobd7llfstv104lojgjs@4ax.com>
<250120182139524759%nospam@nospam.invalid> <EBAaC.779471$675.700429@fx22.fr7>
<260120180337434278%nospam@nospam.invalid> <7kCaC.530046$NT1.81945@fx29.fr7>
<260120180434188128%nospam@nospam.invalid>
From: "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <260120180434188128%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <xdDaC.993612$xT3.184385@fx09.fr7>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:15:57 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:15:55 +0000
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2875568861
X-Received-Bytes: 3785
Print Article
Forward Article
On 26/01/2018 09:34, nospam wrote:
> In article <7kCaC.530046$NT1.81945@fx29.fr7>, David B.
><DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> 
>>>> My request was 100% genuine
>>>
>>> no it wasn't. your original request claimed to want to learn how to do
>>> it yourself. that was bullshit. you had *zero* intention of learning.
>>>
>>> when you 'enrolled' (your words) at the photoshop forum, your first
>>> question was not about retouching, but how the site made money.
>>
>> You are wrong - yet again.
>>
>> I asked who was paying to run the forum, and why.
> 
> in other words, not wrong.

Sadly, you completely miss the point. :-(

> you went there to troll, not to learn.

Once again you are mistaken. :-(

I went there, at Tony's suggestion, to ask if anyone could help with 
renovation of an old photograph of my granddad.

They did! :-)

Photos - there's two, one Sepia, one B&W

https://www.photoshopgurus.com/forum/attachments/granddad-scanf-jpg....

https://www.photoshopgurus.com/forum/attachments/granddad-scanfff-jp...

In granddad's left hand is what is known as a 'Swagger Stick'!

You can read about them here:-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swagger_stick

So, granddad wan't just an ordinary soldier - I guess he was at least a 
Corporal, or above, to have such a stick!  :-)


>> IAMSAM, a moderator, decline to tell me, other than that it is being
>> paid for "by the forum owner".
> 
> because it's none of your business.

Why do YOU care what *I* do, 'nospam? It's none of YOUR business.

>> You cannot change the truth. Anyone may read what he said at this link:-
>>
>> https://www.photosh
> 
> as you've been repeatedly told, that requires a login.

So? Log in! Easy.

>>>> and I am very pleased with the outcome.
>>>
>>> of course you are, because you mooched off of others.
>>
>> I have neither the software nor the experience to achieve what other
>> folk have done.
> 
> that's very true.

I'm not trying to deny anything.

>> The expression "off of" has always been used by those folk who are
>> ill-educated. You are showing your true colours now! :-P
>>
>> http://grammarist.com/usage/off-of/
> 
> ad hominem.

Not applicable. You're a Troll! :-P

-- 
David B.