Subject: Re: Time-lapse photography
On 26/01/2018 09:34, nospam wrote:
> In article <7kCaC.530046$NT1.81945@fx29.fr7>, David B.
><DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>>>> My request was 100% genuine
>>>
>>> no it wasn't. your original request claimed to want to learn how to do
>>> it yourself. that was bullshit. you had *zero* intention of learning.
>>>
>>> when you 'enrolled' (your words) at the photoshop forum, your first
>>> question was not about retouching, but how the site made money.
>>
>> You are wrong - yet again.
>>
>> I asked who was paying to run the forum, and why.
>
> in other words, not wrong.
Sadly, you completely miss the point.
> you went there to troll, not to learn.
Once again you are mistaken.
I went there, at Tony's suggestion, to ask if anyone could help with
renovation of an old photograph of my granddad.
They did!
Photos - there's two, one Sepia, one B&W
https://www.photoshopgurus.com/forum/attachments/granddad-scanf-jpg....
https://www.photoshopgurus.com/forum/attachments/granddad-scanfff-jp...
In granddad's left hand is what is known as a 'Swagger Stick'!
You can read about them here:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swagger_stick
So, granddad wan't just an ordinary soldier - I guess he was at least a
Corporal, or above, to have such a stick!
>> IAMSAM, a moderator, decline to tell me, other than that it is being
>> paid for "by the forum owner".
>
> because it's none of your business.
Why do YOU care what *I* do, 'nospam? It's none of YOUR business.
>> You cannot change the truth. Anyone may read what he said at this link:-
>>
>> https://www.photosh
>
> as you've been repeatedly told, that requires a login.
So? Log in! Easy.
>>>> and I am very pleased with the outcome.
>>>
>>> of course you are, because you mooched off of others.
>>
>> I have neither the software nor the experience to achieve what other
>> folk have done.
>
> that's very true.
I'm not trying to deny anything.
>> The expression "off of" has always been used by those folk who are
>> ill-educated. You are showing your true colours now!
>>
>> http://grammarist.com/usage/off-of/
>
> ad hominem.
Not applicable. You're a Troll!
--
David B.