Subject: Re: Fuji buys Xerox. The king is dead
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, sms<email@example.com> wrote:
> No one thought mirroless would displace SLRs so quickly but the size and
> weight advantages proved irresistible for a) non-studio photography
> (where size and weight don't matter) and b) sports, and wildlife
> photography where continuous auto-focus performance is better with the
> SLR, and an optical viewfinder is preferred. But for other professional
> use, like weddings, the size and weight advantages of mirrorless systems
> are overwhelming.
mirrorless has not displaced slrs. not even remotely close.
In terms of camera system used, DSLR cameras were behind 88.8% of
the winners, mirrorless cameras had 5.55%, and other types represented
maybe one day they will. not today.