From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 08:00:48 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <020220180800489852%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <310120180547163901%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <310120181744134985%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <010220180919475046%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <010220181928387092%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="e9a52a062251c43e85fc8a20babf256d";
logging-data="29867"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+nT4fpFZHoDvXm5vFxOLFD"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fQU/qWGSgIwHlUx6V6gYJJ+OMyM=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, Eric Stevens<> wrote:

> >>> >> Nope. It's your understanding of the English language is fucked up. I
> >>> >> was commenting on "The file permissions problems are something I could
> >>> >> do without but they continue to work as intended and have never
> >>> >> brought Windows to a grinding halt."
> >>> >
> >>> >you brought up networking. why did you mention networking in a
> >>> >discussion about spyder issues?
> >>> 
> >>> Because you named Spyder problems and file permissions in the one
> >>> sentence. 
> >>
> >>nope. bill said that.
> >
> >The way I remember it, the Spyder issue *was* file permissions. It
> >couldn't write the new calibration file to a certain folder. That's
> >why they were in the same sentence. Thinking more about it, Eric might
> >have mentioned another separate issue, the one that many people had
> >when upgrading to 10. But I still think the Spyder problem had the
> >same cause. 
> Frankly, I can't remember.

fortunately, others do.