From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 18:11:13 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <020220181811137578%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <hh237dp586ja13o3gq7md44u0q1tcf27sg@4ax.com> <310120180547163901%nospam@nospam.invalid> <77h47d9d52rs1iq5fvgj47qsgqq5n3eom0@4ax.com> <310120181744134985%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1k57dlfi0rr8hk7i4uad36sidrrq85l8q@4ax.com> <010220180919475046%nospam@nospam.invalid> <66a77dlb85d1ruamajquvd28hk2nsilses@4ax.com> <010220181928387092%nospam@nospam.invalid> <rsc87ddrt4u68jm6l7nhribnpk6g6dichg@4ax.com> <020220180800489820%nospam@nospam.invalid> <47q97dt32bgqim8jldno7qps1nf0fdid5t@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e9a52a062251c43e85fc8a20babf256d";
logging-data="2636"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Q1otcHXNTDCMzWQBxX7AN"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p0EhRsM1JqzqkvPAtQPe8kSKvt4=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<47q97dt32bgqim8jldno7qps1nf0fdid5t@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

> >
> >> >very strange.
> >> >
> >> >> So, you see I did not mention networking in a discussion about Spyder
> >> >> issues.
> >> >
> >> >then why did you mention networking issues in a discussion about spyder
> >> >and permissions?
> >> 
> >> Read the fucking thread. You will find that I have already explained
> >> this in more detail than I am accustomed to get from you.
> >
> >avoiding answering, as usual.
> >
> >nowhere did you say why you mentioned networking.
> 
> In the context of file permissions. It's just a few paragraphs above.
> Can't you understand it?

except that your spyder problem involved a locally attached device, so
there wouldn't be any networking.

thus your mentioning networking was a new context.

> >> >> >in another post, you mentioned repeated bluescreens. that would be
> >> >> >considered a grinding halt.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I also mentioned that was with Windows 2000 which dates back to the
> >> >> last century.
> >> >
> >> >it still counts.
> >> 
> >> For what?
> >
> >that windows has a lot issues, ones which you are dismissing as normal
> >because you're used to there being problems all the time.
> 
> You seem to lumping together all the problems over history. Let me
> assure you I no longer suffer from the problems of Windows 2000.

only because you're not running win2k anymore. now you're suffering
from win10 problems, and dismissing them.