From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx33.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Message-ID: <r2aa7d56ctop6ujifgt657pnp48mklp3fe@4ax.com>
References: <77h47d9d52rs1iq5fvgj47qsgqq5n3eom0@4ax.com> <310120181744134985%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1k57dlfi0rr8hk7i4uad36sidrrq85l8q@4ax.com> <010220180919475046%nospam@nospam.invalid> <66a77dlb85d1ruamajquvd28hk2nsilses@4ax.com> <010220181928387092%nospam@nospam.invalid> <rsc87ddrt4u68jm6l7nhribnpk6g6dichg@4ax.com> <020220180800489820%nospam@nospam.invalid> <47q97dt32bgqim8jldno7qps1nf0fdid5t@4ax.com> <020220181811137578%nospam@nospam.invalid>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 60
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 16:15:57 +1300
X-Received-Body-CRC: 137260223
X-Received-Bytes: 3083
Print Article
Forward Article
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 18:11:13 -0500, nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>In article<47q97dt32bgqim8jldno7qps1nf0fdid5t@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens
><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> >
>> >> >very strange.
>> >> >
>> >> >> So, you see I did not mention networking in a discussion about Spyder
>> >> >> issues.
>> >> >
>> >> >then why did you mention networking issues in a discussion about spyder
>> >> >and permissions?
>> >> 
>> >> Read the fucking thread. You will find that I have already explained
>> >> this in more detail than I am accustomed to get from you.
>> >
>> >avoiding answering, as usual.
>> >
>> >nowhere did you say why you mentioned networking.
>> 
>> In the context of file permissions. It's just a few paragraphs above.
>> Can't you understand it?
>
>except that your spyder problem involved a locally attached device, so
>there wouldn't be any networking.

Which is why I didn't lump them together.
>
>thus your mentioning networking was a new context.

It arose from Bill W's mention of problems arising from file
permissions.
>
>> >> >> >in another post, you mentioned repeated bluescreens. that would be
>> >> >> >considered a grinding halt.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I also mentioned that was with Windows 2000 which dates back to the
>> >> >> last century.
>> >> >
>> >> >it still counts.
>> >> 
>> >> For what?
>> >
>> >that windows has a lot issues, ones which you are dismissing as normal
>> >because you're used to there being problems all the time.
>> 
>> You seem to lumping together all the problems over history. Let me
>> assure you I no longer suffer from the problems of Windows 2000.
>
>only because you're not running win2k anymore. now you're suffering
>from win10 problems, and dismissing them.

How would you know?
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens